Friday, October 10, 2008

Menagerie

I've been dragging my feet with regards to posting this week, because writing feels a lot like work at the moment. I had a Civil Procedure practice exam this morning, which meant that I spend my week writing an extensive outline covering the cases and lectures from the past five weeks. Plus, I have a draft of my second memo for Legal Research and Writing due Tuesday, so I've been trying to work on that, and I have a practice essay question due next week for my Torts class. Just when you think you've got law school figured out, the pattern shifts.

Taking it from the top: last weekend was action-packed. I traveled to Virginia with Nadia to find an Olive Garden (Endless salad and bread sticks?! How do they do it?), went on a boat cruise (at left) on the Potomac with Donna , and went to church with the Supreme Court. Yes, you read that last item correctly. Have you ever heard of the Red Mass? It's an annual Catholic Mass held for people in the legal profession (e.g., lawyers, judges, professors, students, etc.). There's a world-famous one always held in D.C.--here's what Wikipedia has to say about it:
"One of the better-known Red Masses is the one celebrated each fall at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle in Washington, D.C. on the Sunday before the first Monday in October (the Supreme Court convenes on the first Monday in October). It is sponsored by the John Carroll Society and attended by Justices of the Supreme Court, members of Congress, the diplomatic corps, the Cabinet and other government departments and sometimes the President of the United States."
St. Matthew's was very cool, in a cathedral sort of way. As you can see from the photo (at right), it's got a lot going on, aesthetically. I was particularly intrigued by a small squirrel hanging out at the feet of one of the angels in the arch... any thoughts as to the symbolism? I attended the Mass with some other Catholic students from Georgetown Law, and we definitely spotted Justices Roberts, Alito, and Thomas... and I think I saw Scalia, but it was from a distance. I'm something of a nerd, so I created Supreme Court Justice flashcards (with photos) for my iPhone so as to ensure that I could properly identify all of the justices. Don't judge me. (Ha ha... don't judge me... ahem. I'll stop, now.) There were tons of important church leaders there, as well, including several archbishops, Cardinal Foley (he gave the homily), tons of bishops, and the leaders of the John Carroll Society, which is, for all intents and purposes, the who's who of Catholic professionals in D.C. After the Mass, I used my sweet Georgetown connections to get a seat at the John Carroll Society brunch. I sat at a table with a recently retired Georgetown Law professor and his wife, and they were great. I hope I'm that sociable when I'm 79 years old.

This week was primarily consumed by academics, but there were some other things going on as well. I watched the debate on Tuesday, which wasn't nearly as entertaining as the vice presidential debate, obviously, but still had its moments. I was watching with other students in my dorm, which made for a delightful evening of tongue-in-cheek commentary.

A few weeks ago, I had mentioned the Catholic Forum, and the potential formation of a small group Bible study. What I neglected to mention was that, well, I am co-leading that Bible study with a fellow 1L, Mike. At first, I was sort of shocked that there wasn't a Bible study at Georgetown, but then I saw and felt the need for Bible study here, and, after prayerful consideration, I was compelled to answer that call. Mike and I have been meeting and discussing and planning, and last night we had our first small group gathering. To put it frankly: we were the only two people to show up. Drat! I think we need more publicity. I mean, I baked a cake! You'd think that luring people with dessert would be more effective. Regardless, we are not disheartened by this turnout; this is not about us, but about God. All we can do is serve, and see what happens. Please, keep the small group in your prayers.

Today, after my Civil Procedure practice exam, I went for a long walk. I had vague thoughts of going to the National Archives, but the lines were gargantuan (darn you, schoolchildren!), so I walked across the street to the National Gallery of Art Sculpture Garden. So cool! As the name suggests, it is a garden with a myriad of sculptures. I'm glad I discovered it, because it seems like a good place to get lost in thought for a little while. My favorite sculpture was a gigantic spider (at left) by Louise Bourgeois, who, according to the blurb in the garden's pamphlet, has many works featuring spiders that appear as "looming and powerful protectresses, yet are nurturing, delicate, and vulnerable." I found this seemingly contradictory imagery intriguing, since I often associate spiders with my own mother, who has an affinity for the macabre.

After the garden, I meandered up and down the Mall for a while. I probably walked a good five miles, all told. I really miss walking. I realize that sentence sounds absurd, but allow me to elaborate. After four years of walking several miles daily in Berkeley, I truly feel its absence in my life living on-campus at Georgetown Law. The time spent walking was an opportunity to think, to observe, and often to pray. It's a challenge to build that caliber of contemplation and quietude into my day here. I miss walking.

I have high hopes for this weekend. We get Columbus Day (a.k.a., Indigenous Peoples' Day) off, which is lovely. I have high aspirations for productivity, but I'm also a bit worn out from this week, so that extra day will afford me the opportunity to be constructive by recharging as well as working. Peace, guys.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Discovery

October? How is it already October? I moved back East six weeks ago? Wow… just, wow.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the start of undergrad, as it is my only analogous experience to starting law school. Did the first six weeks fly by this quickly during my first semester at Cal? How soon did this new form of education start to feel routine—that is, how soon did I grow accustomed to lecture styles, to the reading materials? When did the novelty of dorm life wear off? When did I know that certain student groups would be my passion for the duration of my time there? When did I meet the people that had the deepest impact upon my understanding of education, of God, of life, of myself?

And yet, this isn’t Berkeley; in so many ways, the analogy falls short. After this, I’ll be entering the “real world,” not more school. My peers are older, more mature (for the most part). I’m surrounded by people who are all studying the same field—as diverse as our interests might be, everything is ultimately within the legal realm. I’m 2,849 miles away from home instead of 47. The setting is the epitome of urban, rather than a casual college town. Can I really compare the two experiences?

It is challenging, because I grew accustomed to life being a certain way in Berkeley. Within the first week of school each semester, I could always fill in my plans for the next 4 months in my agenda. Life was habitual. I have yet to establish habits here. I have aspirations as to how I’d like to live, certainly, but very few things that I’ve tried have emerged as habits yet. A very basic example: I don’t have a “spot” at the library. At Cal, I had a couple of places that were my favorite spots to study in the library. I lack defaults here; I must consider each choice anew. Consequently, I’ve been trying different places, to figure out what I like best. I’ve studied on every floor in each of our libraries. I think the 5th floor of Williams is emerging as my favorite, but it depends on whether I want a comfortable chair, or an interesting window view, or a big table, or simply to people watch. And, that cuts to the essence of my inquiries here: what do I want? What do I need?

And so, the discovery process continues.

On the lighter side, my Civil Procedure professor continues to amaze me with his incredible “words of wisdom” (thanks, Molly):
Professor: “His arm was torn off. I just…”
Class: “…hate it when that happens!”
Seriously, we all responded in chorus. You know you’re going to have an interesting semester when there’s a running joke about plaintiffs who’ve had their arms ripped off.

By the way, I posted a D.C. to-do list; check it out beneath the Prayer to St. Thomas More in the side bar. Suggestions are welcome!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Realization

Today, in Civil Procedure, at the very end of class, our professor announced an assignment not listed on the syllabus due tomorrow (i.e., 22.5 hours later). He posted a page-long hypothetical situation on our course website, and told us that we should come to class with a two-page written response, which should take two to three hours. I was a bit surprised, to say the least, but thankfully CivPro is my only class on Thursdays, so I’ve been working on it most of the afternoon and evening: reading in the library for hours, diligently reviewing my notes, meeting up with classmates to discuss, and meticulously writing my response.

And yet… why? There is no way that this will be turned in—he doesn’t want to read 120 of these! That’s when it hit me: this assignment has no bearing on anything except my understanding of subject-matter jurisdiction. Argh, my professor tricked me into studying harder… again! He keeps doing that to me. I want to argue that it’s not necessary, but I have to agree that it’s far more effective than merely suggesting that I ought to review 28 U.S.C. § 1332. All the same, I feel duped.

Speaking of CivPro—and legal trickery, for that matter—I have an awesome quote from my casebook from last night’s reading:
“Here is one of the many instances where the law achieved results thought desirable through the use of transparent fictions.”
The quote is referring to—well, it’s kind of tedious to explain. Trust me… you don’t want to know. What? You do? Um, okay, you asked: The quote is referring to diversity of citizenship with respect to corporations for establishing the original jurisdiction of a civil case in the federal district courts involving a corporation. Given that the citizenship of stockholders determines the citizenship of a corporation, the section operates under the premise that courts will treat a corporation as though all of its stockholders are from the state of its incorporation for the purposes of original jurisdiction based on diversity. Talk about truthiness! Yet, it's a necessary fallacy: otherwise, the reality is that stockholders are probably from a large number of states, which would make it very difficult to have diversity of citizenship in a case to which a corporation is a party.

See? I told you that you didn’t want to know.

Anyhow, I have other things to share from this week, but I'll leave it until tomorrow, when I'll have more time to write.

9/26/08 EDIT: Well, I'll be darned if my Civ Pro professor didn't collect the assignment. Apparently he does want to read 120 papers this weekend...

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Haiku

I haven't seen this meme in ages! It's an automatic haiku generator. Delightful.

Haiku2 for inthepursuitofhisjustice
unrelenting i
can already see that there
is still much to learn
@
Created by Grahame


A couple of my favorites generated:

sentiment that studies
must be done with a profound
and awesome respect

was delightfully
dorky in a middle school
dance sort of structure

some research in the
library today it felt
very official

this fall that we will
trust in god for our guidance
and our strength amen

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Quotable Professors

I thought I'd share some quotable statements that I jotted down this week from my professors...

"The definition of a lawyer is a person who sees five things where everyone else sees only one." - Torts professor, on the ability of lawyers to break up complex ideas into individual elements

“This isn't the Hoboken School of law, thankfully. Hoboken School of Law is a fabulous law school, but it’s in New Jersey.” - Civil Procedure professor, referencing a running joke about the fictitious Hoboken School of Law

“We live in a messy, dependent, qualified world that requires messy, dependent, qualified sentences.” - Legal Research and Writing professor, in a rather lucid moment

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Neat!

So, I made a video greeting to share with my family, because I think it'll make them happy... especially my mom. It's my first real attempt at making a video and posting it on YouTube, so forgive the rudimentary nature of my editing. Although I really made the video for my family, not for my blog, I thought I'd post it here as well:


Tuesday, September 16, 2008

The Scoop

"The universe... invites exploration as is meant to facilitate the interpersonal experience of a loving God.... In such a view of the universe, both teacher and student are always involved in an adventure of rigorous investigation and professional exactitude. But because of the inherently religious quality of all reality, such study must always be done with a profound and awesome respect and a reverential drive for excellence....

"Jesuit education, then, can never settle for a strong intellectual dimension without an equally strong moral dimension incarnated in specific human and religious values.... Information will never suffice in itself, but becomes an element in the process of personal formation and transformation which is central to Jesuit education."

- George A. Aschenbrenner, S.J., The Jesuit University Today: An Introduction to the Ignatian Vision in Higher Education
This is a quote from an article that we discussed this evening in the Catholic Forum (Georgetown Law's Catholic student organization). Having never attended a school with a Jesuit tradition, and having attended public school all but 6th grade, I want to learn more about what it means to participate in a Jesuit education. This quote interested me in particular because of the emphasis upon a close relationship between human and religious studies. I appreciated the sentiment that studies must be done in earnest, because our education affects us in more than a purely intellectual way.

The question of the role of Ignatian spirituality in a legal education, then, becomes all the more complex in light of moral relativism, which comes in direct opposition to the catholic--that is, universal--moral law grounded in our common humanity. I do not presume to have answers, let alone fully formed opinions, on these issues (yet?), but I will continue to ponder as I experience my own contentious legal education in the Jesuit tradition.

I just noticed that the Jesuit motto "ad majorem Dei gloriam" (translation: "for the greater glory of God") can be found in part in the St. Thomas More prayer (see sidebar) that is the inspiration for the title of this blog: "for the glory of God and in the pursuit of His justice." When I was on the main Georgetown campus in Gaston Hall for the university's President's Reception, I noticed that this phrase was engraved into the wall, adding the phrase "inque hominum salutem," which would make the full Georgetown version of the motto "for the greater glory of God and the salvation of humanity." Intriguing resonance.

On the lighter side... I bought a really nice ice cream scoop! It's hefty, which makes it easy to scoop, and it has a neon green handle. I'm kind of into the color green right now... although it's always been in my top three (blue, green, and purple), I thought purple was my favorite color. And yet, I keep gravitating toward green (e.g., pea coat, bedspread, wireless mouse, laptop case, dish towels, and now ice cream scoop). I needed the ice cream scoop because I'd recently rediscovered my love for rainbow sherbet--a delightful swirl of orange, pineapple, and raspberry sherbet. It was my favorite flavor at 31 Flavors growing up, and I don't know why I forgot about it for so long. (It also has substantially less fat and cholesterol than ice cream, which I suppose is a neat bonus, although it has no direct bearing on my consumption.) The Safeway version even has little chunks of pineapple in it. What a treat!