The Problem of Pain
During the month of October, we read The Problem of Pain by C.S. Lewis. I've always loved C.S. Lewis, from my childhood readings of the classic Chronicles of Narnia to my later explorations of his Christian writings such as Mere Christianity and The Screwtape Letters. Lewis does such a wonderful job of presenting arguments with clear examples that shed light on difficult concepts.
In the first chapter, I enjoy Lewis's treatment of the question often raised--if God is good, then why doesn't he make everyone perfectly happy? Either He isn't good, or he lacks the power to make everyone happy, or perhaps both. Lewis makes a very elaborate argument about suffering being a necessary element of a world that also contains free will, which I will not attempt to summarize here. But, I did want to share this quote:
Meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prefix them to the other words 'God can'. It remains true that all things are possible with God: the intrinsic impossibilities are not things but nonentitites. It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of His creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because His power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.Mm, logic.
I also loved this quote:
When we want to be something other than the thing God wants us to be, we must be wanting what, in fact, will not make us happy.I was rather surprised that one of the chapters was on Animal Pain, which struck me as a bit incongruous with the flow of the book in general. He argues that animals are sentient but lack selfhood in a way that supports immortal souls. However, along the way, he rejects other, weaker arguments against the immortality of animals. My favorite is this:
Nor am I greatly moved by jocular inquiries such as 'Where will you put all the mosquitoes?'--a question to be answered on its own level by pointing out that, if the worst came to the worst, a heaven for mosquitoes and a hell for men could very conveniently be combined.Ha! True that.
Pope Francis
Chris and I are about to start St. Bonaventure's The Life of Saint Francis of Assisi, followed by Introduction to the Devout Life by St. Francis de Sales. However, we took a week off from our longer readings to explore the America Magazine interview with Pope Francis. There were a number of wonderful things said during the interview, and I would encourage everyone to read it. I particularly enjoyed his emphasis that he is a sinner, that he practices discernment in all things, that he sees holiness in patience, and that uncertainty in discernment is leaving room for the Lord.
There was one part of the interview that has been quoted repeatedly by the media, around the idea of focusing less on divisive issues such as gay marriage and abortion. I was excited about this from the first moment I read it, but all the more so in reading it in the context of a discussion of the Church as a field hospital for the world:
We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time.
The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently. Proclamation in a missionary style focuses on the essentials, on the necessary things: this is also what fascinates and attracts more, what makes the heart burn, as it did for the disciples at Emmaus. We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel. The proposal of the Gospel must be more simple, profound, radiant. It is from this proposition that the moral consequences then flow.
I love this idea that we should focus on sharing a "simple, profound, radiant" Gospel, and everything else will fall into place. I have found Pope Francis's emphasis on simplicity and the preferential option for the poor to be extremely heartening, and cannot wait to see what his papacy holds for the world.
Have you read anything inspirational lately?
Have you read anything inspirational lately?



